Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 Misc. 2d 1053 - Wallace v. Weiss

82 Misc. 2d 1053 - Wallace v. Weiss’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a photograph is not used in connection with an advertisement and does not illustrate an article on a matter of public interest, but appears in a periodical primarily to enhance the sales of the periodical, the use may be considered a commercial one for the purpose of trade. Thus, it cannot be doubted that the subject of a centerfold has a cause of action against a magazine for the unauthorized use of his photograph.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “undisputed that the plaintiff has incurred no out of pocket loss, except attorney’s fees for the commencement of this action. The attorney’s fees do not constitute an item of damage in a libel action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.