82 Misc. 2d 506 - Regnell v. Page’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Moreover, the New York authorities are not so definitive as Sugar posits as to the burden of proof, except as to nonresident corporate defendants with only transitory assets in New York, as was the case in the most recent New York decisions cited in Sugar. (Hydromar Corp. of Delaware v. Construction Aggregates Corp., 32 A.D.2d 749 , 300 N.Y.S.2d 797 ; Geo. A. Fuller Co. v. Vitro Corp. of America, 26 A.D.2d 916 , 274 N.Y.S.2d 600 .) ...” “And in a case more nearly like ours, where the issue is one of fraud and disposition and secretion of assets, and no question of jurisdiction is involved, it has recently been ruled, in vacating an attachment, in MacMillan, Inc. v. Hafner, 42 A.D.2d 533 , 344 N.Y.S.2d 729 : ‘At best, respondent presented but a scintilla of proof as to the requisite elements of the fraud cause of action alleged in the complaint. Such a perfunctory showing falls far short of the requirements to support the drastic remedy of attachment.’ ” 82 Misc.2d at 510, 511 , 369 N.Y.S.2d at 941 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Trigo Hnos., Inc. v. Premium Wholesale Groceries, Inc.

2. “attachment is unnecessary to the security of the plaintiff,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Carey v. Sugar