82 N.C. App. 1 - State v. Hurst’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Ohio · Missouri v. Hunter · Whalen v. United States · Albernaz v. United States · McDougall v. North Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“defendant's right to be free from double jeopardy under Article I, § 19, of the North Carolina Constitution and Amendments V and XIV to the United States Constitution was violated by his punishment under two statutes which the legislature intended to be mutually exclusive under facts such as those in the case at bar.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hurst“The issue before us is whether a single series of acts may support convictions under both N.C.Gen.Stat.Secs. 14-87 (armed robbery) and 14-72 (felonious larceny) (1981) when there has been only one taking from one victim at one time. We hold that it cannot.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hurst“the same goods from the same person at one time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.