Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 N.C. App. 150 - State v. Teasley

82 N.C. App. 150 - State v. Teasley’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 132 N.C. App. 440 - State v. Rich (1999), 92 N.C. App. 523 - State v. Fink (1989)

21 state decisions

801986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Illinois v. Gates · Franks v. Delaware · Jones v. United States · Michel v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the chemist visually examined nineteen envelopes of vegetable matter seized from the defendant and determined that the contents were the same. He then examined chemically and microscopically the contents of five of the envelopes selected at random and identified the contents as marijuana. The court found that there was sufficient evidence to go to the jury on the question of whether all the envelopes contained marijuana.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hile we do not commend such a practice by law enforcement officers, and while defendant's arguments are not without substance, we believe that pursuant to Hayes and its progeny our Supreme Court would hold that on the evidence presented it was for the jury to decide whether defendant possessed a mixture of cocaine weighing more than 200 grams but less than 400 grams.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Under our statutes a magistrate issuing a warrant can base a finding of probable cause only on statements of fact confirmed by oath or affirmation of the party making the statement, or on information which the magistrate records or contemporaneously summarizes in the record [pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-244 and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-245(a) ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.