Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 NEB 235 - In re Newby

In re Newby’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
November 1944
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1944

7 state decisions

4019081910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re the Disbarment of Smith · In re Disbarment Proceedings of Newby · In re Parsons · State ex rel. Stapleton v. Wines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We cannot say that we are satisfied from the evidence that he (Newby) is innocent of the charges made against him, nor can we say that we are satisfied to a reasonable certainty of his guilt. The mind of the court being in this condition, it is our duty to give Mr. Newby the benefit of the doubt, and to hold that the charges have not been sustained by the evidence to such an extent as to warrant the infliction of the severe penalty that must inevitably have followed had we been fully satisfied of his guilt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.