Schnepp v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably Deutscher v. State (1979), Harper v. State (1968)
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griffin v. California · Beck v. State of Ohio · 58 Cal. 2d 748 - People v. McFarland · 45 Cal. 2d 755 - People v. Martin · Badillo v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““At approximately 9:00 p.m., April 23, 1965, the manager of Jimmy’s Motel, Reno, Nevada, observed a man leaving an unoccupied room in the motel carrying a large object. The manager ran to the room and found the television set missing and called the police. “The police dispatcher immediately broadcast the reported burglary, gave the location of the crime, stated that a television set had been taken, and reported that the culprit had left in an automobile. An officer in the immediate vicinity responded. Some two to five minutes after the broadcast, the officer arrived at the scene and observed defendant’s automobile approximately one-half block west of the motel moving at a slow speed. This was the only car on the street at the time, had an Oregon license plate tied loosely on by wire, and its occupants were seated crowded against their respective doors. After radioing for assistance, the officer stopped defendant’s car. The defendant came running back to the police car, but the officer worked his way up to defendant’s car to get a better look at the passenger. When alongside, the officer observed a television set partially covered with a sweater on the front seat. Defendant stated, T don’t know who it belongs to.’ 1 “Two other officers came to the aid of the officer who stopped the car, and they requested the passenger in defendant’s automobile to remove himself from the car. At that time, one of the officers also observed the TV set on the seat. “The defendants were then arre”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schnepp v. State“Reasonable cause for arrest has been defined as such a state of facts as would lead a man of ordinary care and prudence to believe or entertain an honest and strong suspicion that the person is guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harper v. State“Ordinarily, the burden of showing an illegal search and seizure is on the moving party. Lyles v. State, 330 P.2d 734 (Okl. App. 1958)....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.