Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 Nev. 294 - Downing v. Marlia

Downing v. Marlia’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
4
states following
April 1996
most recently cited

2 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 1996 · most notably General Electric Company v. Bush (1972), Shoshone Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. Dolinski (1966)

2 district · 26 state decisions

1201966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Troupe v. Chicago, Duluth & Georgian Bay Transit Co. · Duran v. Mueller · Hotel Riviera, Inc. v. Short · Wagon Wheel Saloon & Gambling Hall, Inc. v. Mavrogan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . No party may assign as error the giving or the failure to give an instruction unless he objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection.. . .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Appellant’s objection to the refusal of Instruction B was insufficient under Rule 51. Merely informing the court that refused instructions ‘In my opinion, (are) proper and under the evidence in this case should be given’ does not assist the trial judge in determining the grounds for objection so that he may properly consider whether to revise his initial decision and cure what otherwise might be error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The Court: Does the plaintiff have any instructions to offer in addition to those the Court has indicated will be given? “Mr. Garroway: The plaintiff has offered A, B, C, and D, instructions that have been refused by the Court. Each of these instructions in my opinion, is proper and under the evidence in this case should be given.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.