Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 N.M. 296 - Crowe v. State Ex Rel. McCulloch

Crowe v. State Ex Rel. McCulloch’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 1992
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 1992

12 state decisions

60197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Floeck v. Bureau of Revenue · State v. Luna · Ellis v. Parmer · Lorenzino v. State ex rel. James · Taggader v. Montoya

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[To cancel a license by operation of law, i.e., not by director mandate] * * * would be to relieve the Chief of Division of his duties to make a determination of facts authorizing the cancellation and to effect the cancellation pursuant thereto, and, in the case now before us, would be to give the court power to declare a license cancelled by operation of law without giving the licensee an opportunity to be heard, since the licensee was not made a party to this suit.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Plaintiffs concede [that a former statute], which gives the right of appeal from decisions of the Chief of Division, `as to the issuance' of `any additional license,' does not give the right to appeal from decisions authorizing a transfer of an existing license.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.