Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 N.M. 412 - Gullo v. Brown

Gullo v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
August 1998
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Heckathorn v. Heckathorn · Tyler v. Aspinwall · Demarigny v. Demarigny · Ferret v. Ferret · Kirby v. Kent

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Obviously, the application of the doctrine of res judicata bars appellant from obtaining the relief that he seeks. [Gullo v. Brown, supra 483 P. 2d at 296 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.