Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 N.M. 487 - State v. Crump

State v. Crump’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
10
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably Trimble v. State (1984), State v. Moore (1986)

83 state decisions — followed in 10 states

40019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · Gilbert v. California · Burgett v. Texas · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he unlawful taking, restraining or confining of a person with the intent that the person, or victim, be held as security for the performance, or forbearance, of some act by a third person.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““If a criminal offense is charged in general terms in an information or indictment, as provided in § 41-6-7, N.M. S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6, 1964), and then is followed by a detailed statement of the facts allegedly constituting the offense, the prosecution is limited to establishing the facts so detailed. * * * (Citations omitted.) This is necessarily so, since a defendant in a criminal case is entitled to know with what he is charged and to be tried solely upon the charges against him. (Citations omitted.)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““A person who is given into the possession of the enemy, in a public war, his freedom (or life) to stand as security for the performance of some contract or promise made by the belligerent power giving the hostage with the other.” (cited in 484 P.2d at 334 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.