State v. Soria’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2006 · most notably State v. Lard (1974), State v. Sinyard (1983)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mora v. Martinez · State v. Baros · State v. Serrano · State v. Hatley · State v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Conditions of order deferring or suspending sentence. — The district court shall attach to its order deferring or suspending sentence such reasonable conditions as it may deem necessary to ensure that the defendant will observe the laws of the United States, the various states and the ordinances of any municipality. The defendant upon conviction may be required: A. to pay the actual costs of his probation service not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200) annually in one [1] or several installments; B. to make restitution or reparation to aggrieved parties for actual damages or loss caused by the crime for which conviction was had; C. to provide for the support of any persons for whose support he is legally responsible; D. to undergo available medical or psychiatric treatment and to enter and remain in a specified institution, when required for that purpose; E. to be placed on probation under the supervision, guidance or direction of probation authorities for a term not to exceed that of the maximum sentence prescribed by law for the commission of the crime for which he was convicted; and F. to satisfy any other conditions reasonably related to his rehabilitation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.