Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 N.M. 597 - Hockett v. Winks

Hockett v. Winks’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably Duke City Lumber Company, Inc. v. Terrel (1975), Maxey v. Quintana (1972)

28 state decisions

23019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCauley v. Ray · Sauter v. St. Michael's College · Lumpkins v. McPhee · McLean v. Paddock · Board of Education v. State Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * insofar as the opinion in Ham v. Hart, supra, held that the principle of equity applicable to the rescission of contracts is applicable in the tort of deceit (or fraud and deceit as it is sometimes called), undertook to modify the essential elements of the tort of deceit, or sought to create a new tort predicated upon the stated principle of equity, we disavow and hereby overrule that opinion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * Evidence is clear and convincing in support of the essential elements of deceit only if it instantly tilts the scales in the affirmative on each element, when weighed against the evidence in opposition, and the fact finder’s mind is left with an abiding conviction that the charges as to each element are true. * * * ” (Emphasis Ours)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.