Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 N.M. 711 - State v. Deats

State v. Deats’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably State v. Boyer (1985), State v. Lopez (1973)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions

18019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. McAfee · State v. Turnbow · State v. Aull · State v. Everitt · State v. Lopez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under this point defendant points to a $20,000.00 appeal bond which he claims is excessive. Relief on this ground is not appropriately sought in arguments on the merits on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] sentencing judge has discretion in determining whether sentences are to run consecutively or concurrently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “discretion in this area will not be interfered with unless he has violated one of the sentencing statutes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.