Clark v. Duval Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 1989
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Martinez v. Research Park, Inc. · Lozano v. Archer · Geeslin v. Goodno, Inc. · Waymire v. Signal Oil Field Service, Inc. · Pankey v. Hot Springs Nat. Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The purpose of the notice requirement “ * * * is to enable the employer to investigate the facts while they are accessible and, if necessary, to employ doctors so as to speed recovery * * Waymire v. Signal Oil Field Service, Inc., 77 N.M. 297 , 422 P.2d 34 (1966). Another purpose of the notice requirement is to allow the employer to protect himself against simulated or aggravated claims. Lozano v. Archer, 71 N.M. 175 , 376 P.2d 963 (1962).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.