Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 Ohio App. 171 - Reed v. Ramey

82 Ohio App. 171 - Reed v. Ramey’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2006

5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

701947195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f the facts untraversed had shown that the [company] had a lien on plaintiffs’ property which could be foreclosed, then the plaintiffs were fully warranted in protecting their title and ownership of the property from possible sale under foreclosure by paying the creditor, and would have a right to collect the amount of such payment from the defendants. Under such circumstances, they could not be considered mere volunteers.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.