82 Ohio App. 3d 341 - State v. Ingram’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
99 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably State v. Wilson (2007), 126 Ohio App. 3d 485 - State v. Garcia (1998)
99 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Florida v. Royer · Florida v. Bostick · Bumper v. North Carolina · 11 Ohio App. 3d 38 - State v. Danby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * the amount of proof that will produce in the mind of the trier of fact a firm belief or conviction as to the allegations to be proved. It is an intermediate standard * * * being more than a preponderance of the evidence and less than evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.”
21 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he question whether a consent to a search was in fact 'voluntary' or was the product of duress or coercion, express or implied, is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of all the circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Terrell“this record may have supported a contrary finding that Ingram was not seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.