82 Ohio App. 3d 528 - L & H Leasing Co. v. Dutton’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Anchor v. M O'Toole L (1996), Grey v. Walgreen Co. (2011)
1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp. · 133 Ohio St. 520 - Hummel v. Hummel · 144 Ohio St. 139 - Bennett v. Sinclair Refining Co. · 144 Ohio St. 186 - State v. Hoffman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the gain realized from business or investment over and above expenditures.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he first requirement is a joint contract. A joint contract can be express or implied by the parties. The second requirement is an intention to associate themselves as joint venturers. The parties must have actually intended to become joint venturers. The third requirement is a community of interest and joint control. This gives the joint venturers the right to direct or the authority to control the purpose of the venture. The fourth requirement is an agreement for the division of the profit and loss. Between the joint venturers there must be a sharing of the profits and losses jointly, not severally.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) a benefit conferred by a plaintiff upon a defendant; (2) knowledge by the defendant of the benefit; and (3) retention of the benefit by the defendant under circumstances where it would be unjust to do so without payment (i.e., the 'unjust enrichment' element).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.