Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 Ohio App. 3d 831 - State v. Lowman

82 Ohio App. 3d 831 - State v. Lowman’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
3
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 126 Ohio App. 3d 95 - State v. Lloyd (1998), 102 Ohio App. 3d 185 - State v. Yarber (1995)

43 state decisions

1901992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Jenks · Delaware v. Prouse · 41 Ohio App. 3d 109 - State v. Brandenburg · 30 Ohio App. 3d 141 - State v. Bakst

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “need not establish a threshold level of alcohol concentration in the defendant's body. It must, however, prove that the defendant operated a vehicle when his faculties were appreciably impaired by the consumption of alcohol.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen required, a signal of intention to turn or move right or left shall be given continuously during not less than the last one hundred feet traveled by the vehicle[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(A)(1) No person shall operate any vehicle, * * * within this state, if, at the time of the operation, any of the following apply: {¶60} "(a) The person is under the influence of alcohol, a drug of abuse, or a combination of them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.