State v. Teamer’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 130 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 131 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably State v. Gwen (2012), 146 Ohio App. 3d 245 - State v. Young (2001)
1 federal appellate · 130 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jenks · State v. Lott · Provident Bank v. Wood · 131 Ohio St. 27 - State v. Huffman · Bernardini v. Board of Education
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 131 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage“is to be determined from all the attendant facts and circumstances available.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage“Accordingly, we find that the quantity of a controlled substance is not a factor in determining whether a defendant may lawfully be convicted of drug abuse, in violation of R.C. 2925.11 (A). As long as there is scientifically accepted testimony from which a factfinder could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that a controlled substance was present, a conviction for drug abuse pursuant to R.C. 2925.11 (A) will not be reversed based on the amount of contraband involved.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.