Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

82 Ohio St. 3d 96

In re Calim

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1998

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1998-06-10

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1999

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-06-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Applicant’s current application for admission to the bar is disapproved. Applicant is permitted to reapply for admission to the practice of law in Ohio by submitting a new application that contains complete, up-to-date information on all matters raised by the local admissions committee as well as any new matter that may have arisen after the hearing.

¶2Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.
/82/ohiost3d/96 · .json · Public domain