State v. Milek’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1993
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Once the right to counsel attaches, an individual `is entitled to the benefit of an attorney's presence, advice and expertise in any situation where the state may glean involuntary and incriminating evidence or statements for use in the prosecution of its cause against [him].'" 82 Or.App. at 91 , 727 P.2d 164 , quoting State v. Sparklin, supra, 296 Or. at 93 , 672 P.2d 1182 (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“circumstances are conceivable where the presence of counsel would be helpful[,] * * * Article I, section 11, and the Sixth Amendment require that counsel may not be barred from attendance at the presentence interview.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.