Regan v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “There is no basis for distinguishing between Section 402(b) (1) and Section 403-A(h). “Both . . . are general eligibility provisions which are routinely applied in appropriate cases.” Id. at 240, 354 A.2d at 908 . There is nothing inherent in Section 403-A(h) which would render the application of the procedure dictated by Fabric “illogical, unwise, or contrary to the purposes of the Act.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Gray v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review