Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 So. 2d 136 - Tilghman v. Mayo

82 So. 2d 136 - Tilghman v. Mayo’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 1998

16 state decisions

9019551960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Van Hoff v. Redevelopment Agency of San Francisco · Boyer v. Dye · State v. Brown · State v. Helm · McCleary v. Hudspeth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In general, to constitute a proper basis for the claim of former jeopardy a proceeding must be valid, and if the proceedings are `lacking in any fundamental prerequisite which renders the judgment void' they will not constitute a proper predicate for such a claim.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Bandoni v. State · 103 So. 2d 115 - Greene v. City of Gulfport
  2. “that the writ heretofore issued must be, and it is hereby, quashed and the petitioner remanded to the sheriff of Polk County with directions to the trial court to vacate the sentence and upon resentence of the petitioner to take into account the time already served, plus his earned gain time.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 154 So. 2d 701 - Michell v. State Ex Rel. Callahan · 99 So. 2d 282 - Tilghman v. Culver
  3. “is entitled to receive full credit for the time which he served under his void sentence, along with the gain time which he earned, Perry v. Mayo, Fla., 72 So.2d 382 , and that the trial court did not take all of this time into consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 99 So. 2d 282 - Tilghman v. Culver

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.