C.D. v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 614 So. 2d 468 - Thomas v. State · 765 So. 2d 76 - Porter v. State · 979 So. 2d 991 - State v. Barnes · Cuva v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the officer searched him incident to the arrest and found marijuana. Id. at 1039 . The trial court's denial of the motion to suppress was predicated on its finding that the furtive movements necessitated a search to insure the officers' safety. Id. The district court reversed, holding that when an officer stops a person for a noncriminal infraction, a furtive movement—without a bulge or an indication of a weapon—”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“does not have reasonable suspicion that a defendant is armed merely -3- because, following a non-criminal traffic stop, the defendant appears nervous and keeps his hands in or near his pockets”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“violation of a municipal ordinance is neither a 'crime' nor a 'noncriminal violation'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.