Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 SO3D 118 - Allen v. State

Allen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. California · Ginsberg v. New York · 898 So. 2d 1 - Knowles v. Beverly Enterprises-Florida · 863 So. 2d 1180 - Bautista v. State · 666 So. 2d 898 - Moonlit Waters Apartments, Inc. v. Cauley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... the Legislature amended section 827.071 to punish possession of “a” photograph that depicted sexual conduct by a child. The Legislature was aware of the application of the “a/any” test by Florida courts when it enacted section 847.0138 in 2001. It seems clear the Legislature intended separate prosecutions for multiple images transmitted in one instant message when referencing “an image” (instead of “any image”) when it enacted section 847.0138.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.