Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

82 So. 3d 910

State v. BELLUSCIO

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-06-29

Decided 2011-06-29

PER CURIAM.

¶1 We find no error in the trial court’s imposition of a downward departure sentence, because the defendant met his burden of proving the requirements for a downward departure sentence, pursuant to section 921.0026(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2009), and presented unrebutted testimony that the defendant required specialized treatment for mental health disorders unrelated to substance abuse, which was not available at the Department of Corrections.

¶2 Affirmed.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.
/82/so3d/910 · .json · Public domain