Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 SW2D 417 - Barker v. Heaney

Barker v. Heaney’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
September 1990
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 1990

2 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

701935194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ewing v. Goode · Lippold v. Kidd · Loudon v. Scott · 10 Tex. Civ. App. 231 - Wilkins v. Ferrell · Matuschka v. Murphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘ * * * when the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to show that the injury was negligently caused by defendant, it is not enough to show the injury, together with the expert opinion that it might have occurred from negligence and many other causes. Such evidence has no tendency to show that negligence did cause the injury.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.