Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
November 2014
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 26th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Idaho v. Wright · White v. Illinois · Tome v. United States · Harris v. State · King v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Taylor v. State · Horner v. State“A juror’s inability to come to the courthouse due to a severe gastrointestinal ailment provides some evidence of the requisite incapacity from performing the duties assigned to that juror that the trial court may consider in making a determination of disability. Although a stomach ailment is only temporary, it remains within the trial court’s discretion to determine whether this juror had become disabled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Freeman v. State“"Rule 803(4) is premised on the patient’s selfish motive in receiving appropriate treatment.” This motive is no longer present once a diagnosis has been made and treatment has begun. The details a patient may report during an extended course of treatment may be prompted by other motives, such as denial or deception, or be influenced by the treatment process itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Taylor v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.