Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 U.S. 140 - Pickersgill v. Lahens

Pickersgill v. Lahens’s Empirical Analysis

82 U.S. 140 · 1872

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
April 1929
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1929

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

50187218801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bradley v. Burwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““whose duty is measured alone by the legal force of the bond, and who is under no moral obligation whatever to pay the obligee, independent of his covenant, and consequently there is nothing- on which to found an equity for the Interposition of a court of chancery.?’ Pickersgill v. Lahens, 15 Wall. 140 , 144, 21 L. Ed. 119 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.