Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 U.S. 454 - Tomlinson v. Jessup

Tomlinson v. Jessup’s Empirical Analysis

82 U.S. 454 · 1872

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
22
cited 22 times by the Supreme Court
18
states following
September 1938
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions (22 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1938 · most notably Choate v. Trapp (1912), Sinking-Fund Cases v. United States Central Pacific Railroad Company (1879)

3 federal appellate · 40 state decisions — followed in 18 states

2201872188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New Jersey v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is no subject over which it is of greater moment for the state to preserve its power than that of taxation. It has, nevertheless, been held by this court, not, however, without occasional earnest dissent from a minority, that the power of taxation over particular parcels of property, or over property of particular persons or corporations, may be surrendered by one legislative body, so as to bind its successors and the state. • * * In these eases, and in others of a similar character, the exemption is upheld as being made upon considerations /moving to the state which give to the transaction the character of a contract. It is thus that it is brought within the protection of the federal constitution. In the case of a corporation, the exemption, if originally made in the act of incorporation, is supported upon the consideration of the duties and liabilities which the corporators assume by accepting the charter. When made, as in the present case, by an amendment of the charter, it is supported upon the consideration of the greater efficiency with which the corporation will thus be enabled to discharge the duties originally assumed by the corporators-to the public, or of the greater facility with which it will support, its liabilities and carry out the purposes of its creation. Immunity from taxation, constituting in these eases a part of the contract with the government, is, by the reservation of power such as is contained in the law of 1841, subject to be revoked equally ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It shall become part of the charter of every corporation which shall, at the present, or any succeeding session of the General-Assembly, receive a grant of a charter, or any renewal, amendment, or modification thereof (unless the act granting the charter, renewal, amendment, or modification shall, in express terms, except it), that every charter, of incorporation granted, renewed, or modified as aforesaid, shall at all times remain subject to amendment, alteration, or repeal by the legislative authority.” (11 St. at Large, p. 108, § 41.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““ The reservation affects the entire relation between the State and the corporation, and places under, legislative control all rights, privileges, and immunities derived, by its charter, directly from the State.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.