Haycraft v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2015
6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hangen v. . Hachemeister · Shea v. Hudson · Hawver v. . Bell · Railway Co. v. Jones · Smith v. Mine & Smelter Supply Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is connected by some competent evidence that brings the cost or purchase price into relation with market value ..., the evidence of cost or purchase price becomes incompetent and immaterial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The measure of damages for the conversion of property is the market value, if the property has a market value, at the time of the conversion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the cost or price paid or reproduction value”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.