Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 VT 160 - In re Mason's Will

In re Mason's Will’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
May 1989
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 1989

12 state decisions

50190919101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Costello · Dunning v. Maine Central Railroad · Crocker v. Chase's Estate · Burton's Admr. v. Burton · Manley's v. Staples

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The points made regarding the charge are all based upon the failure of the court to instruct the jury that in the circumstances disclosed by the evidence the burden upon the issue of undue influence was on the proponent. The rule for which the contestant contended has since been held inapplicable in cases where the beneficiary is the donor’s child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is ordinarily within the discretion of the court to reject or receive evidence of a fact that is conceded. (Citations.) But the nature of the evidence offered and its relation to the conceded fact and to the main issue may be such that any action of the court thereon will be revisable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.