Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 Wash. 2d 816 - In Re Koome

82 Wash. 2d 816 - In Re Koome’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably 99 Wash. 2d 878 - Washington Federation of State Employees v. State (1983), 84 Wash. 2d 901 - State v. Koome (1975)

24 state decisions

7019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Barnard v. Board of Education · 52 Wash. 2d 84 - Keller v. Keller · 55 Wash. 2d 576 - State v. Estill · State Ex Rel. Roseburg v. Mohar · Campbell Lumber Co. v. Deep River Logging Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n the context of contempt proceedings relating to alleged disobedience or defiance of a lawful judgment, decree, order, or process of a court by one directly bound thereby or in privity thereto, that it is unnecessary that the one charged be personally served with a copy of the order. It is sufficient if the alleged contemnor has knowledge of the order and its legal effect.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A pregnancy of a woman not quick with child and not more than four lunar months after conception may be lawfully terminated under RCW 9.02.060 through 9.02.090 only: (a) with her prior consent and, if married and residing with her husband or unmarried and under the age of eighteen years, with the prior consent of her husband or legal guardian, respectively, . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “designed to supersede enforcement of a judgment or order brought up for review, thereby maintaining the status quo and preserving the fruits of the appeal should it prove successful.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.