Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 Wash. App. 236 - Mueller v. Miller

82 Wash. App. 236 - Mueller v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2014

22 state decisions

160199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 98 Wash. 2d 434 - Wilson v. Steinbach · 115 Wash. 2d 657 - Berg v. Hudesman · Roaquin v. Brown · 122 Wash. 2d 648 - King County v. Washington State Boundary Review Board · 124 Wash. 2d 749 - Cutler v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]very such judgment shall be a lien thereupon to commence as provided in RCW 4.56.200 and to run for a period of not to exceed ten years from the day on which such judgment was entered ....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, after the expiration of ten years from the date of the entry of any judgment heretofore or hereafter rendered in this state, it shall cease to be a lien or charge against the estate or person of the judgment debtor. No suit, action or other proceeding shall ever be had on any judgment rendered in this state by which the lien shall be extended or continued in force for any greater or longer period than ten years.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]f ... matters outside the pleading are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in rule 56.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.