82 Wis. 2d 737 - Schultz v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2007
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Opper v. United States · Richardson v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc. · State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. Burke · 24 Wis. 2d 527 - State v. Nutley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to hold that the trial court's involvement in the elicitation of testimony during a trial resulted in such prejudice as to require a new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carprue“obligation to see to it that justice is done but must do so carefully and in an impar tial manner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[o]ther evidence adduced at trial corroborated the defendant's version of the events”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bannister
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.