Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 F.2d 105 - Pullen v. Bowen

Pullen v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

820 F.2d 105 · 1987

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
January 2012
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably Welter v. Sullivan (1991), Cummings v. Sullivan (1991)

29 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2401987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412

Relies on United States v. Locke · Guthrie v. Schweiker · Tyler Business Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · United States v. Acres of Land More or Less Situate in Vernon County State of Missouri · Gavette v. Office of Personnel Management

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n practice, any difference between the 'reasonable in fact and law', the 'more than merely reasonable', and the 'clearly reasonable' standards appears more semantic than real.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “); United States v. 1,378.65 Acres of Land, 794 F.2d 1313 , 1318 (8th Cir.1986) (”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.