Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 F.2d 1166 - Danner v. United States

Danner v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

820 F.2d 1166 · 1987

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2015

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

1501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Stafford v. Oklahoma · Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc. · Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is insufficient to impugn a criminal conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “establish that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer's performance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the petitioner must be able to point to specific instances in the record”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.