Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 F.2d 118 - United States v. Mize

United States v. Mize’s Empirical Analysis

820 F.2d 118 · 1987

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
6
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably United States v. Kington (1989), 707 So. 2d 547 - De La Beckwith v. State (1997)

18 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

1501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1005 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 656

Relies on Burks v. United States · United States v. MacDonald · Lombard v. Marcera · Alder v. United States · United States v. Loud Hawk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We think it significant that section 3161(d)(1) requires restarting the clock where the indictment “is dismissed upon motion of the defendant, or any charge contained in a complaint filed against an individual is dismissed or otherwise dropped.” (Emphasis added.) The two disjunctive clauses, with their passive construction, suggest that the subsection applies to any manner of dismissal of an indictment except on the government’s own motion, presumably including a sua sponte dismissal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If the defendant is to be tried again following a declaration of the trial judge of a mistrial or following an order of such judge for a new trial, the trial shall commence within seventy days from the date the action occasioning the retrial becomes final. If the defendant is to be tried again following an appeal or a collateral attack, the trial shall commence within seventy days from the day the action occasioning the retrial becomes final. ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]his right is implicated only when a defendant is facing pending and live charges, whether by an indictment, an information, or a complaint.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.