Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 F.2d 1495 - In the Matter of John Joseph METZ, Debtor. DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. John Joseph METZ, Appellee

In the Matter of John Joseph METZ, Debtor. DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. John Joseph METZ, Appellee’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

180
cited by 180 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
February 2019
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 180 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2019 · most notably Johnson v. Home State Bank (1991), Hardin v. Caldwell (1988)

36 federal appellate · 9 district ·

8201987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325

Relies on Perez. v. Campbell · Crocker National Bank v. American Mariner Industries, Inc. · Goeb v. Heid · Federal Land Bank v. Glenn · Lawrence Tractor Co. v. Gregory

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 180 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A bankruptcy judge's finding that a debtor's plan is proposed in good faith is a finding of fact reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[The debtor] proposed to pay the arrears to [the mortgages] over thirty-six months at a market rate of 12%. He had shown good faith by keeping the payments on his house current. His increased salary made it possible for the first time in the bankruptcy proceedings to propose such a cure. Such a bona fide change in circumstances is precisely what the bankruptcy judge should examine to determine whether successive filings are proper. See In re Johnson, 708 F.2d 865, 868 (2d Cir.1983).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(4) “claim” means— (A) right to payment, whether or not such right is reduced to judgment, liquidated, unliquidated, fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, legal, equitable, secured, or unsecured; or (B) right to an equitable remedy for breach of performance if such breach gives rise to a right to payment, whether or not such right to an equitable remedy is reduced to judgment, fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, secured, or unsecured.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.