Lovelace v. Dall’s Empirical Analysis
820 F.2d 223 · 1987
Citation profile
58 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Patricia Fuller v. City of Oakland, California George Hart Antonio Romero (1995), Royal American Managers, Inc. v. IRC Holding Corp. (1989)
58 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Hope v. Commissioner · Maclin v. Freake · Lawrence D. Caldwell v. Harold G. Miller, Warden · Sergio Degioia v. United States Lines Company, and Third-Party v. American Stevedores, Inc., and Imparato Stevedoring Corp., Third-Party
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it was clear that the court intended to make fact determinations.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Another policy justifying the jury demand waiver rule is the view that it is unfair to permit a party to have a trial, discover that it has lost, and then raise the jury issue because it is unsatisfied with the result at trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the parties or their attorneys of record, by written stipulation filed with the court or by an oral stipulation made in open court and entered in the record, consent to trial by the court sitting without a jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. William T. Brady James Cardwell Dar-Kel Corporation v. Chester P. Brown, and Lorna Brown De Mena Eric Brown Castelazo Nelly Lozano De Brown, and Maria De Los Angeles Castelazo De Brown, Defendant-Counter-Claimant/appellant v. Hotel Las Arenas, S.A. De C v. Counter-Defendant/appellee. William T. Brady James Cardwell Del-Kel Corporation v. Chester P. Brown, Defendant/cross-Claimant/appellant v. Hotel Las Arenas, S.A. De C v. Cross-Defendant/appellee · 181 F. App'x 551 - All Ems Incorporated v. 7-Eleven Inc
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.