Henry Casella, Cross-Appellant v. Arnold F. Morris, Cross-Appellee’s Empirical Analysis
820 F.2d 362 · 1987
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Cable/Home Communication Corp. v. Network Productions, Inc. (1990), Montgomery v. Noga (1999)
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 101 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 501 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 505 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 35 U.S.C. § 271 · 35 U.S.C. § 285
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios Inc · Original Appalachian Artworks, Inc. v. Toy Loft, Inc. · Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc. · S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the court's choice of discretionary ruling should be in furtherance of the policies of the law that are being enforced, as informed by the court's familiarity with the matter in litigation and the interest of justice.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'one who, with knowledge of the infringing activity, induces, causes or materially contributes to the infringing conduct of another.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] showing of bad faith or frivolity is not a requirement of a grant of fees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.