Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 F.2d 41 - Brandt v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

Brandt v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services’s Empirical Analysis

820 F.2d 41 · 1987

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 14 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Valmonte v. Bane (1994), White Plains Towing Corp. v. Patterson (1993)

35 federal appellate · 14 district · 1 state decisions

4401987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Paul v. Davis · Bishop v. Wood · Codd v. Velger · Knight v. U.S. Fire Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “on him a stigma or other disability that foreclose[s] his freedom to take advantage of other employment opportunities.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[the plaintiff] need not wait until he actually loses some job opportunities because the presence of the charges in his personnel file coupled with a likelihood of harmful disclosure already place him ‘between the devil and the deep blue sea.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “); Edward J. Murphy, the Superintendent of Schools; and Dominick Morreale, principal of the James E. Allen Learning Center, a school for autistic children operated by the Board, claiming that defendants had denied him due process under the fourteenth amendment by failing to grant him a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.