Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

820 F.2d 662

Docket No. 86-2004.

Alexander v. Curtis

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1987.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-06-08

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1990

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relies on Alexander v. Curtis · United States v. Suthard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-06-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Upon a request for a poll of the court on the petition for rehearing en banc, Judge Mumaghan voted for rehearing en banc, all the other active judges voted against it.

¶3It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc shall be, and it hereby is, denied.

¶4The panel has considered the petition for rehearing and is of opinion it is without merit.

¶5It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the petition for rehearing shall be, and it hereby is, denied. Judge Winter dissents from denial of rehearing by the panel. He would rehear the case and grant a new trial for the reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion.

¶6With the concurrence of Judge Russell.

/820/f2d/662 · .json · Public domain