Solida v. McKelvey’s Empirical Analysis
820 F.3d 1090 · 2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 2674 · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Farmer v. Brennan · Butz v. Economou · Carlson v. Green · Ashcroft v. al-Kidd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An action against an officer, operating in his or her official capacity as a United States agent, operates as a claim against the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“does not encompass injunctive and declaratory relief where...the equitable relief requires official government action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“directly implicated by the defense of qualified immunity and [is] properly before us on interlocutory appeal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rodriguez v. Swartz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.