Mena v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
820 F.3d 114 · 2016
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1101 · 18 U.S.C. § 659 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Taylor v. United States · Moore v. United States · Chickasaw Nation v. United States · Pfeiffer Company Inc v. Ford · Moncrieffe v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the whole purpose of the entrustment is for an honest stewardship of the funds”). As discussed below, § 16-8-2 applies whenever a victim gives up property based on a falsehood, even without any ongoing expectation of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“presume that the prior conviction rested upon nothing more than the least of the acts criminalized and then determine whether even those acts are encompassed by”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cabrera v. Barr“the minimum conduct criminalized by the statute of conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cabrera v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.