United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
820 F.3d 356 · 2016
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2023
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Tennessee v. Garner · Mincey v. Arizona · Sedillo v. United States · Cady v. Dombrowski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A mixed standard of review applies to the denial of a motion to suppress evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] mixed standard of review applies .... We review the district court's findings of fact for clear error and the denial of the suppression motion de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the officer has a reasonable belief that an emergency exists requiring his or her attention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.