Goel v. Bunge, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
820 F.3d 554 · 2016
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1602 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976)
Relies on Burnett v. New York Central Railroad · Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc. · Goldman v. Belden · Global Network Communications, Inc. v. City of New York · Koch v. Christie's International PLC
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“facts stated on the face of the complaint, ... documents appended to the complaint or incorporated in the complaint by reference, and ... matters of which judicial notice may be taken.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A document is integral to the complaint where the complaint relies heavily upon its terms and effect.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because a Rule 12(b)(6) motion challenges the complaint as presented by the plaintiff, taking no account of its basis in evidence, a court adjudicating such a motion may review only a narrow universe of materials.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.