Hernandez v. Pena’s Empirical Analysis
820 F.3d 782 · 2016
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 9001 · 22 U.S.C. § 9003 · 22 U.S.C. § 9007
Relies on Abbott v. Abbott · Friedrich v. Friedrich · Chafin v. Chafin · 134 S. Ct. 1224 - Lozano v. Montoya Alvarez · England v. England
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the age of the child; (2) the stability of the child’s residence in the new environment; (3) whether the child attends school or day care consistently; (4) whether the child attends church [or participates in other community or extracurricular school activities] regularly; (5) the respondent’s employment and financial stability; (6) whether the child has friends and relatives in the new area; and (7) the immigration status of the child and the respondent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alcala v. Hernandez“considered in light of evidence ... concerning the child's contacts with and ties to his or her State of habitual residence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fernandez v. Bailey“at some point a child may become so settled in a new environment that return is no longer in the child's best interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fernandez v. Bailey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.