United States v. Hare’s Empirical Analysis
820 F.3d 93 · 2016
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 6 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · United States v. Russell · Wayte v. United States · McCleskey v. Kemp · United States v. Armstrong
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a meritorious selective prosecution claim, a criminal defendant would be able to name others arrested for the same offense who were not prosecuted by the arresting law enforcement agency; conversely, plaintiffs who allege that they were stopped due to racial profiling would not, barring some type of test operation, be able to provide the names of other similarly situated motorists who were not stopped.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We will assume that the jury charge on aiding and abetting is inadequate under Rosemond . [The defendant's] rights, however, were not affected because the jury was given a correct Pinkerton instruction.... Given the copious evidence under the Pinkerton theory, any inadequacy in the district court's aiding and abetting instruction did not affect [the defendant's] substantial rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an offense that is a felony and - (A) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another, or (B) that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.