Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 P.2d 445 - Reed v. Scott

Reed v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2016

9 state decisions

50199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pope v. United States · Flaks v. Koegel · Geddes v. United Financial Group · Dundee Cement Company v. Howard Pipe & Concrete Products Inc · Eisler v. Stritzler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Defendants are deemed to have confessed the allegations contained in There is no recitation that the court heard or considered any evidence, either testimonial or documentary, in support of the damages awarded. 11 23 The Supreme Court explained that the Oklahoma Pleading Code provision found at 12 O.S. § 2008(D) 6 is identical to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(d) and that our jurisprudence, like federal jurisprudence, "requires the production of proof as to the amount of unliquidated damages before rendition of a default judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We found that the judgment roll, on its face, revealed that a portion of the default judgment was beyond the issues framed by the pleadings, and that the trial court lacked the power to render a part of the particular default judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Averments in a pleading to which a responsive pleading is required, other than those as to the amount of damage, are admitted when not denied in the responsive pleading_ (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.